Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Barbara's avatar

Let's call forth the Myth of the Wendigo.

"Wendigo" is a far more common usage in general English and modern popular culture, while "wetiko" is a specific cognate used within academic or social commentary contexts. Here in the northern heartland, our Anishinaabe neighbors share with us the Myth of the Wendigo. You should NOT have selected the abstract, academic term - it's left brained, like my definitions below.

"Wendigo is common in general English, horror fiction, films, TV, and internet folklore, referring to the mythological creature, often depicted in popular culture as an antlered, cannibalistic monster (a modern invention and not traditionally accurate). The term also lends its name to the disputed medical term "Wendigo psychosis".

Wetiko is less common in general use. Primarily used within Cree, Anishinabek, and other Algonquian-speaking communities and by authors or academics discussing the concept's original cultural meaning as a "mind-virus" or spiritual sickness embodying insatiable greed and excess."

You selected a term which is technically more correct, but now with a totally abstract, academic usage. You needed to call forth the myth. A reading of Harari's Sapiens leads to the obvious conclusion: Intersubjective Realties are catalyzed by MYTH, not by abstractions. Therefore, we need better myths. Never use an academic abstraction when there is a mythological term available in common usage. Academically, the term is "Wendigo psychosis", NOT Wetiko psychosis.

By the way, as I understand the myths of my Anishinaabe neighbors, "Wendigo psychosis" is an accurate metaphor for the behavior of western Oligarchs, in both the boardroom and in politics, as well as media. Consumerism has infected a large portion of people in modern societies with a more passive version of this mind virus that makes them willing victims as they scramble for more useless things that distract them from the emptiness of their lives.

People don't recover from a mind virus by hearing an academic, left-brained, discourse. They recover if they can envision a powerful myth that bathes the dark virus in clarifying light. While anthropologically incorrect, the vision of a dark, antlered, cannibalistic monster whose greed devours the people around them is likely to be effective in evoking resistance.

To all the readers here -- when you have a choice, evoke the powerful myth; avoid the dry, academic discourse.

Elisabeth Robson's avatar

I would argue weitiko began long before agriculture or European expansion to the Americas. All expansions of humans into new places led to massive extirpations and extinctions of species, especially the megafauna. Before European expansion, we had the Mongol Empire, the Han Dynasty, The Bantu migrations, Polynesian expansion (leading to the extinction of thousands of species!), the Ottoman Empire, and more, all colonizers. Taking land from other species and other humans is something we've been doing a VERY long time. As Lyle Lewis has argued, what changed the game was developing the spear and a shoulder to throw it with. Add control of fire to that, and bam. We take over the world, and relatively fast (geologically speaking).

141 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?