Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mark Bevis's avatar

The only good news is that declining EROEI may well make it impossible for Europe to start a war. NATO is paper tiger, with current naval and air superiority over Russia, but, it has little regenerative capacity. Putting aside the manpower requirements, the war in Ukraine has shown that NATO would collectively have to have an ability to manufacture per year:

1000 tanks

30,000 anti-tank rockets

500 SP artillery guns

1500 APCs/MICVs

120,000+ drones

300+ fighter jets

10,000x ATGW

20,000x AA missiles

300x Gepard equivalents

at a minimum just to replace war losses.

The industrial capacity is just not there - the steel/aluminium/copper/tungsten carbide/carbon fibre is not being mined and refined at the level required - the energy to do any of this is just not there.

I keep seeing them crowing with orders for 184 of this, 1000 of that, 500 of the other, etc, but none of this will arrive before 2027, and might be fulfilled by 2030 or 2035. This is pissing in the wind in military material terms.

Unless the elites are prepared to invest in 19th century style warfare with massed infantry, horses and bayonets, but killing on that rate means they'll soon run out of customers for remaining retail consumption, and go bankrupt anyway.

Not to mention the levels of conscription needed. 25% of the UK is registered disabled for example (a legacy of failed Covid policy and deliberate austerity) - where are the troops going to come from despite a net European population of 500 million or so? The only source I see is the millions of migrants fleeing Africa and the Middle East, the west would have to forcibly conscript them in return for some form citizenship, a la the French Foreign Legion.

Not that any of this will prevent them trying, get prepared for a short term "shock and awe" propaganda campaign saying we can defeat the Russians in 6 months! It'll make GDP look really good for a small period until Russian missiles blow up the respective stock exchanges across western capitals.

The other factor that warmongers in EU institutions have to factor in is that Amerika under a Trump-esque leadership sees Europe as a rival, not an ally, and their armed forces may well leave us to it and bug out just before the Kaliber missiles arrive. Without American logistics, NATO cannot go to war with anybody. So in addition to all the above, European NATO would literally have to build its own logistics network and capacity from next to scratch. Do we see a NATO wide order for 500 air-air refuelling tankers.....?

Hermes of the Threshold's avatar

"Knowing that no one is really holding the steering wheel only makes the party even more wild." Your writing is great, HS, but I disagree on this point - and all one would have to do is look to COVID ("fraudvirus") to demonstrate it. Every country in the world did the exact same lockdowns, the exact same censorship, the exact same forced heart attack jabs - it should be obvious to anyone with a pulse that there is an operational, organized structure operating above and behind actual governments. Otherwise, there would have been a great variety in response to it, and there wasn't at all. And they're doing the same gradated lockstep now with CBDC rollouts.

The actual structure looks like this, chart from Iain Davis: https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!LV5T!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fbcb15709-4915-455e-b2a1-0c127679b618_1920x1080.png

I discuss the structure here: https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/the-global-world-order-is-centralized

34 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?